Faithless Electors & the Will of the People
Hammer Forum is made possible by the Rosenbloom Family
Do members of the Electoral College have the right to be "faithless" and vote against the popular vote of the state they represent? In 2016 there were 10 such cases of “faithless electors” during the contentious and controversial election of Donald Trump. With the 2020 election just months away, the Supreme Court has unanimously decided that states can require that electors vote for the candidate chosen by the voters of the state they represent. What does this decision mean for the 2020 presidential election and for the future of the Electoral College? Will this help lead to the adoption of a national popular vote?
Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson moderates a panel including UC Berkeley dean and legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky and USC professor and election law scholar Franita Tolson.
ATTENDING THIS PROGRAM?
Join live: RSVP to receive an email reminder on the day of the program with the link to tune in. The link to join will also be posted here 2 hours before the program starts. Note that this program has a capacity limit of 1,000 concurrent viewers.
Watch later: This program will be recorded. The recording will be available soon after on Hammer Channel, our video platform where you can watch 1000+ talks, performances, artist profiles, and more.
Help with Zoom: If you have never used Zoom before, you will be prompted to download the Zoom app or join from your browser. Zoom works best on the Chrome browser.
Having trouble? Contact our visitor experience team at [email protected] or 310-443-7000.
Give back: This program is free. The Hammer relies on your support in order to present its programs and exhibitions. Please consider making a contribution.
Hammer Forum is an ongoing series of timely, thought-provoking events addressing social and political issues.
Media sponsorship is provided by KPCC Southern California Public Radio.